Rattlesnake Ridge

Someday in the future, the Seattle residents will rise up and challenge the groups overprotecting the Cedar River Watershed. Could a few hikers really pose a danger to the water supply? If exceptions are made for tribal hunting, why not hikers as well? Rattlesnake Ridge is just at the edge of the boundary, towering above Rattlesnake Lake. The state trailheads at Rattlesnake Lake could use another trail to spread out the hikers.
I'm not recommending anyone visit this spot, it is inside the watershed and currently restricted. This is for informational purposes, for the day it becomes legal.

From the Iron Horse Trailhead, hike the trail 2 minutes to an old road, which shortly cuts over onto the old railroad grade, the Iron Horse Trail. A sign there gives the mileages to various locations, including the Hyak Trailhead 21 miles from there. All along the south side of the trail are the watershed signs stating Cedar River Watershed, keep out. An easy trail could cut south, cross over a few maintenance roads, and start up the long northeast ridge of Rattlesnake Ridge. This area was harvested long ago, and the stand of timber currently on the hillside is a very nice 2nd growth. In another 30 years, the average hiker would probably think it is old growth. With the ridgeline dropping off the north side, the forested route would be quite scenic. As the trail would approach the summit, the ridge would narrow but still be safe for families. The summit area is defined, probably about 20 feet by 20 feet, just enough room for an educational shelter. No views, but something different. Now that I think about it, why not have the trail start at the environmental education center directly below the summit? Technically, all water flow from that side goes into Rattlesnake Lake and not into the Cedar River. The trail would be open during visitor hours?

Route: